fix: use the upstream interface name

[major0]

The commit revision naming seems to have been introduced by proton-api-bridge in a custom fork simply due to their personal preferences regarding the API call. This name change functionally breaks backwards compatibility with the upstream proton-go-api, as well as any other tools using proton-go-api. Such breaking changes need to be justified and can not simply be a matter of naming preferences.

[henrybear327]

Hey @major0,

Thanks for creating this PR!

Based on my vague memory, this was likely due to missing implementation / field of the entire Drive-related functionality at the time, so I took the naming from iOS codebase (as it was the source of truth at the time).

I will look into reverting this naming change since the field included in UpdateRevisionReq is a bit different from CommitRevisionReq, so I am not sure if these are the exact same struct!

Have you run the integration test on your side after making this change? :)

[major0]

I will look into reverting this naming change since the field included in UpdateRevisionReq is a bit different from CommitRevisionReq, so I am not sure if these are the exact same struct!

Have you run the integration test on your side after making this change? :)
Nope, I just went straight into writing a proton-cli... which .. has worked pretty well so far honestly.