Skip to content

Fix bottom-line scrolling and add regression test#107

Merged
hgwr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/fix-scroll-issue-with-j-key
Aug 9, 2025
Merged

Fix bottom-line scrolling and add regression test#107
hgwr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/fix-scroll-issue-with-j-key

Conversation

@hgwr
Copy link
Owner

@hgwr hgwr commented Aug 9, 2025

Summary

  • ensure cursor scrolling triggers when moving off the last visible row
  • add regression test for j scrolling at the bottom of the screen

Testing

  • cargo build --verbose
  • cargo test --verbose
  • pytest -n auto e2e --verbose

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6896daee4ecc832f981199889b2c0258

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hgwr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug where the editor's view did not scroll correctly when the cursor moved past the last visible line. I've implemented a fix to ensure that the editor scrolls as expected, making the next line visible, and I've also added a new end-to-end test to prevent this regression in the future.

Highlights

  • Improved Cursor Scrolling Logic: I've adjusted the internal logic that determines when the editor should scroll its view. Previously, the editor would only scroll when the cursor was beyond the last visible row, leading to the last line being obscured. The change ensures that scrolling is triggered when the cursor reaches the second-to-last visible row, allowing the final row to become visible as intended. This affects character insertion, line appending, and cursor movement commands.
  • New Regression Test for j Motion: I've added a new end-to-end test, test_motion_j_scrolls_at_bottom, to specifically verify that the j (move down) command correctly triggers screen scrolling when the cursor is at the bottom of the visible window. This test simulates a small terminal window and asserts that the content scrolls up as expected.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes an issue with scrolling when the cursor moves to the bottom line of the screen and adds a regression test for it. The logical changes in the Rust code correctly address an off-by-one error in boundary checks. The new e2e test effectively validates the fix. My review includes suggestions to refactor duplicated code in both the new test and the Rust command implementations to improve maintainability.

Comment on lines +147 to +177
def test_motion_j_scrolls_at_bottom():
file_content = "line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6\n"
fd, path = tempfile.mkstemp()
try:
with os.fdopen(fd, "w") as f:
f.write(file_content)

env = os.environ.copy()
env.setdefault("TERM", "xterm")

child = pexpect.spawn(EVI_BIN, [path], env=env, encoding="utf-8")
child.delaybeforesend = float(os.getenv("EVI_DELAY_BEFORE_SEND", "0.1"))
child.setwinsize(6, 80)

# Ensure the editor has finished drawing
get_screen_and_cursor(child)

# Move cursor to the bottom line and attempt to move down once more
child.send("jjjj")
get_screen_and_cursor(child)
child.send("j")
screen, _ = get_screen_and_cursor(child)
clean_screen = screen.split("\x1b[2J")[-1]

assert "line6" in clean_screen
assert "line1" not in clean_screen

child.send(":q!\r")
child.expect(pexpect.EOF)
finally:
os.unlink(path)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This test is a great addition for catching regressions in scrolling behavior. However, there's a lot of boilerplate code for setting up the test environment that is duplicated from the run_motion_test helper function. To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider refactoring the setup and teardown logic into a pytest fixture or a context manager. This would make both this test and run_motion_test cleaner and easier to read.

@hgwr hgwr merged commit 86a8a8d into main Aug 9, 2025
1 check passed
@hgwr hgwr deleted the codex/fix-scroll-issue-with-j-key branch August 9, 2025 05:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant