Skip to content

Conversation

@adecaro
Copy link
Contributor

@adecaro adecaro commented Oct 29, 2025

This PR addresses #940

@adecaro adecaro added this to the Q4/25 milestone Oct 29, 2025
@adecaro adecaro self-assigned this Oct 29, 2025
@adecaro adecaro added bug Something isn't working improvements security labels Oct 29, 2025
@adecaro adecaro marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2025 13:56
@adecaro adecaro force-pushed the 940-dlog-v1-finalization-check-the-issueaction-against-the-passed-metadata branch 3 times, most recently from 6e8a3da to f0386ee Compare November 5, 2025 06:16
@adecaro adecaro marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2025 06:16
@adecaro adecaro requested a review from AkramBitar November 5, 2025 06:16
@adecaro adecaro force-pushed the 940-dlog-v1-finalization-check-the-issueaction-against-the-passed-metadata branch 2 times, most recently from 40613fd to 89c6f49 Compare November 5, 2025 12:20
@adecaro adecaro requested review from HayimShaul and aaadir November 5, 2025 12:20
@adecaro adecaro force-pushed the 940-dlog-v1-finalization-check-the-issueaction-against-the-passed-metadata branch 3 times, most recently from 3f8ac60 to 1f4eaf8 Compare November 10, 2025 12:33
// VerifyIssue checks if the outputs of an IssueAction match the passed tokenInfos
func (s *IssueService) VerifyIssue(tr driver.IssueAction, metadata []*driver.IssueOutputMetadata) error {
func (s *IssueService) VerifyIssue(ctx context.Context, ia driver.IssueAction, metadata []*driver.IssueOutputMetadata) error {
// TODO:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering if to add debug message that says "this method is not implemented".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it definitely needs to be implemented and it can be a good task for the team.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@HayimShaul , please, take the task on. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

your concern was about the implementation of the function, no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@adecaro adecaro Nov 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but good point, please, identify the TODOs in the code, classify them in category so that we can assign priorities and address. Thanks much.

@adecaro adecaro requested a review from AkramBitar November 12, 2025 05:44
Signed-off-by: Angelo De Caro <adc@zurich.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Angelo De Caro <adc@zurich.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Angelo De Caro <adc@zurich.ibm.com>
@adecaro adecaro force-pushed the 940-dlog-v1-finalization-check-the-issueaction-against-the-passed-metadata branch from 1f4eaf8 to dc4199b Compare November 12, 2025 12:31
@adecaro adecaro merged commit 51104c7 into main Nov 12, 2025
53 checks passed
@adecaro adecaro deleted the 940-dlog-v1-finalization-check-the-issueaction-against-the-passed-metadata branch November 12, 2025 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working improvements security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dlog v1 finalization: check the IssueAction against the passed metadata.

3 participants