-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
meta-iotqa: add qa tests for flatpak. #260
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Please help to test this build. |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
ok to test |
|
I noticed there is proxy value set, which may be good in development context, but may be sub-optimal in CI system |
|
Noted. For now the concerned script is disabled due the external network dependency. Will remove the proxy value set from the CI system. Thanks for the input. |
|
Hi SP,
|
|
Hi Peng,
Thanks. |
|
Updated as per Peng's suggestions. Please test. |
b89b95c to
d3b8533
Compare
|
Please remove the test build label and review the pull request. Also merge it to the master branch if looks ok. Thanks. |
d3b8533 to
4e6315e
Compare
Add tests for flatpak command line. Signed-off-by: Shashwat Pandey <shashwatx.pandey@intel.com>
|
@klihub please help to review this flatpak test cases. |
Signed-off-by: Shashwat Pandey <shashwatx.pandey@intel.com>
|
@epyeoh These test cases are ok as such, but they look very basic to me: list installed flatpaks (without checking the output) and run a known flatpak application (without checking its output or anything else). Have you taken a look at what Patrick has done for ostree ? If you'd write similar test cases then I'd expect to have a some test set like:
Have you considered something along those lines ? |
|
@klihub Yes, current test case is basic tests for flatpak.
|
Add tests for flatpak python interface.
Signed-off-by: Shashwat Pandey shashwatx.pandey@intel.com