Draft
Conversation
enitrat
reviewed
Dec 10, 2024
Member
Author
|
blocked because this needs a fix in the cairo vm |
Member
|
Should we close this PR for now and come back later to it? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An initial standalone test for using JIT compilation of the EVM bytecode.
In this test, I've implemented few opcodes that I felt characteristic of the needs of the real EVM bytecodes, hopefully not missing any of the real difficulties with implementation of
Overall, I feel that with very few changes to the opcodes as they are, and a lot of simplification for the syscall and at the interpreter level, we can migrate to jit, which will also save steps (to be estimated) but at least all the input/output argument copying + control flow management