-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 668
[FEAT-STRUCT][Added Corporate Swarm, With Full board/corporate governance] #1085
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pyre found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
|
|
||
| for proposal_data in proposals: | ||
| proposal_id = corporation.create_proposal( | ||
| title=proposal_data["title"], |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Incompatible parameter type Error
| for proposal_data in proposals: | ||
| proposal_id = corporation.create_proposal( | ||
| title=proposal_data["title"], | ||
| description=proposal_data["description"], |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Incompatible parameter type Error
| proposal_id = corporation.create_proposal( | ||
| title=proposal_data["title"], | ||
| description=proposal_data["description"], | ||
| proposal_type=proposal_data["proposal_type"], |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Incompatible parameter type Error
| proposal_type=proposal_data["proposal_type"], | ||
| sponsor_id=list(corporation.members.keys())[0], # Use first member as sponsor | ||
| department=DepartmentType.OPERATIONS, | ||
| budget_impact=proposal_data["budget_impact"], |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Incompatible parameter type Error
| sponsor_id=list(corporation.members.keys())[0], # Use first member as sponsor | ||
| department=DepartmentType.OPERATIONS, | ||
| budget_impact=proposal_data["budget_impact"], | ||
| timeline=proposal_data["timeline"] |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Incompatible parameter type Error
| # Schedule a board meeting | ||
| formatter.print_markdown("Scheduling Board Meeting...") | ||
| meeting_id = corporation.schedule_board_meeting( | ||
| meeting_type=corporation.MeetingType.REGULAR_BOARD, |
Check failure
Code scanning / Pyre
Undefined attribute Error
Description
This PR introduces CorporateSwarm, a sophisticated multi-agent orchestration system that simulates a complete corporate structure with advanced board governance, executive leadership, departmental operations, and democratic decision-making processes. Built on the foundation of EuroSwarm Parliament with corporate-specific enhancements, CorporateSwarm provides a comprehensive corporate simulation including board of directors with democratic voting, executive leadership team coordination, departmental swarm management, financial oversight and reporting, strategic decision-making processes, and compliance and governance frameworks.
The system includes advanced ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) scoring, comprehensive risk assessment and management, stakeholder engagement frameworks, regulatory compliance monitoring (SOX, GDPR, ISO 27001, HIPAA), AI ethics and responsible AI governance, crisis management and business continuity planning, and innovation governance. CorporateSwarm enables organizations to model complex corporate governance scenarios, conduct board meetings, manage committee structures, and make strategic decisions through AI-powered democratic processes. CorporateSwarm represents a revolutionary advancement in multi-agent systems for corporate governance, providing exceptional simulation capabilities for training, analysis, and decision support.
Issue
This addresses the need for sophisticated corporate governance simulation capabilities in multi-agent systems, enabling organizations to model complex decision-making processes, board structures, and strategic planning scenarios.
Dependencies
logurufor loggingpydanticfor data validationswarms.structs.agent.Agentfor individual member agentsswarms.structs.conversation.Conversationfor conversation trackingswarms.structs.hybrid_hiearchical_peer_swarm.HybridHierarchicalClusterSwarmfor democratic decision-makingswarms.structs.swarm_router.SwarmRouterfor swarm orchestrationswarms.utils.history_output_formatterfor output formattingTag Maintainer
@kyegomez
Twitter Handle
https://x.com/IlumTheProtogen
Full Board/Corporate Governance
CorporateSwarm implements an exceptional board governance system that surpasses traditional corporate structures and decision-making processes. The system features a sophisticated board of directors with independent and executive directors, each with specific roles, expertise areas, and voting weights. The board operates through advanced specialized committees including Audit, Compensation, Nominating, Risk, Technology, ESG, Sustainability, Cybersecurity, Innovation, Stakeholder, Crisis Management, AI Ethics, and Data Privacy committees, each with defined responsibilities and meeting schedules. The governance framework includes democratic voting mechanisms where board members and executives participate in strategic decision-making through weighted voting systems. The system tracks comprehensive board performance metrics, monitors compliance with governance standards, and ensures proper quorum requirements for meetings and decisions. CorporateSwarm enables organizations to simulate complex governance scenarios, conduct board meetings with realistic discussion and voting processes, and evaluate the effectiveness of different governance structures. The system supports both regular board meetings and special sessions, with comprehensive minute-taking and resolution tracking. This advanced governance framework provides a foundation for understanding how AI agents can collaborate in complex organizational structures while maintaining accountability, transparency, and effective decision-making processes. The system includes advanced ESG scoring, comprehensive risk assessment and management, stakeholder engagement frameworks, regulatory compliance monitoring, AI ethics governance, crisis management planning, and innovation pipeline management, representing the highest level of corporate governance simulation available.
Architecture Overview
CorporateSwarm is built on a hierarchical structure with multiple layers of governance and decision-making:
Key Components
1. Corporate Members and Roles
2. Board Committees and Governance
3. Democratic Decision-Making
4. Board Meeting Management
Usage Examples
Basic Corporate Setup
Strategic Decision Making
Board Meeting Simulation
Committee Operations
Advanced Governance Features
ESG Scoring and Sustainability
Risk Assessment and Management
Stakeholder Engagement
Compliance Framework
Comprehensive Governance Review
System Architecture Diagrams
Corporate Governance Structure
graph TB subgraph "Corporate Governance Hierarchy" CEO[CEO - Chief Executive Officer] CFO[CFO - Chief Financial Officer] CTO[CTO - Chief Technology Officer] COO[COO - Chief Operating Officer] subgraph "Board of Directors" BC[Board Chair] BVC[Board Vice Chair] ID1[Independent Director 1] ID2[Independent Director 2] ID3[Independent Director 3] ED[Executive Director] end subgraph "Board Committees" AC[Audit Committee] CC[Compensation Committee] NC[Nominating Committee] RC[Risk Committee] TC[Technology Committee] EC[ESG Committee] SC[Sustainability Committee] CYB[Cybersecurity Committee] IC[Innovation Committee] STC[Stakeholder Committee] CMC[Crisis Management Committee] AIC[AI Ethics Committee] DPC[Data Privacy Committee] end subgraph "Departments" FD[Finance Department] OD[Operations Department] MD[Marketing Department] HRD[HR Department] LD[Legal Department] TD[Technology Department] end end CEO --> BC CFO --> BC CTO --> BC COO --> BC BC --> AC BC --> CC BC --> NC BC --> RC BC --> TC BC --> EC BC --> SC BC --> CYB BC --> IC BC --> STC BC --> CMC BC --> AIC BC --> DPC AC --> FD CC --> HRD NC --> LD RC --> OD TC --> TDDecision-Making Flow
flowchart TD A[Proposal Creation] --> B[Committee Review] B --> C{Committee Recommendation} C -->|Approve| D[Board Discussion] C -->|Reject| E[Proposal Rejected] C -->|Modify| F[Proposal Revision] F --> B D --> G[Democratic Voting Process] G --> H[Individual Member Votes] H --> I[Vote Analysis] I --> J{Vote Result} J -->|Approved| K[Implementation] J -->|Rejected| L[Proposal Failed] J -->|Tabled| M[Further Discussion] M --> D K --> N[Department Execution] N --> O[Progress Monitoring] O --> P[Board Reporting]Multi-Agent Interaction Network
graph LR subgraph "Executive Team" CEO_Agent[CEO Agent] CFO_Agent[CFO Agent] CTO_Agent[CTO Agent] COO_Agent[COO Agent] end subgraph "Board Members" BC_Agent[Board Chair Agent] ID1_Agent[Independent Director 1] ID2_Agent[Independent Director 2] ID3_Agent[Independent Director 3] ED_Agent[Executive Director] end subgraph "Committee Agents" AC_Agent[Audit Committee] CC_Agent[Compensation Committee] NC_Agent[Nominating Committee] RC_Agent[Risk Committee] TC_Agent[Technology Committee] EC_Agent[ESG Committee] SC_Agent[Sustainability Committee] CYB_Agent[Cybersecurity Committee] IC_Agent[Innovation Committee] STC_Agent[Stakeholder Committee] CMC_Agent[Crisis Management Committee] AIC_Agent[AI Ethics Committee] DPC_Agent[Data Privacy Committee] end subgraph "Democratic Swarm" DS[HybridHierarchicalClusterSwarm] SR1[Governance Swarm Router] SR2[Executive Swarm Router] end CEO_Agent --> DS CFO_Agent --> DS CTO_Agent --> DS COO_Agent --> DS BC_Agent --> DS ID1_Agent --> DS ID2_Agent --> DS ID3_Agent --> DS ED_Agent --> DS AC_Agent --> SR1 CC_Agent --> SR1 NC_Agent --> SR1 RC_Agent --> SR1 TC_Agent --> SR1 EC_Agent --> SR1 SC_Agent --> SR1 CYB_Agent --> SR1 IC_Agent --> SR1 STC_Agent --> SR1 CMC_Agent --> SR1 AIC_Agent --> SR1 DPC_Agent --> SR1 CEO_Agent --> SR2 CFO_Agent --> SR2 CTO_Agent --> SR2 COO_Agent --> SR2 DS --> SR1 DS --> SR2Corporate Decision-Making Process
sequenceDiagram participant P as Proposal Sponsor participant C as Committee participant B as Board participant D as Democratic Swarm participant M as Members P->>C: Submit Proposal C->>C: Committee Review C->>B: Committee Recommendation B->>D: Initiate Democratic Process D->>M: Distribute Proposal M->>M: Individual Analysis M->>D: Submit Votes & Reasoning D->>D: Aggregate Results D->>B: Voting Results B->>B: Final Decision alt Approved B->>P: Approval Notification P->>P: Implementation else Rejected B->>P: Rejection Notification else Tabled B->>C: Request Further Review endBoard Performance Evaluation
graph TD subgraph "Performance Metrics" A[Board Composition] B[Governance Structure] C[Decision Making] D[Compliance] end subgraph "Composition Metrics" A1[Total Members] A2[Independent Directors] A3[Executive Directors] A4[Independence Ratio] end subgraph "Structure Metrics" B1[Committee Count] B2[Committee Types] B3[Meeting Frequency] end subgraph "Decision Metrics" C1[Meetings Held] C2[Proposals Processed] C3[Votes Conducted] C4[Approval Rate] end subgraph "Compliance Metrics" D1[Quorum Met] D2[Resolutions Passed] D3[Governance Score] end A --> A1 A --> A2 A --> A3 A --> A4 B --> B1 B --> B2 B --> B3 C --> C1 C --> C2 C --> C3 C --> C4 D --> D1 D --> D2 D --> D3Complete Corporate Task Processing Workflow
sequenceDiagram participant User as User/Stakeholder participant CS as CorporateSwarm<br/>Main Orchestrator participant BC as Board Chair participant AC as Audit Committee participant CEO as CEO participant CFO as CFO participant CTO as CTO participant FD as Finance Director participant TD as Technology Director participant FA as Financial Analysts participant SE as Senior Engineers participant DS as Democratic Swarm participant ESG as ESG Swarm participant RISK as Risk Swarm participant COMP as Compliance Swarm Note over User, COMP: TASK INITIATION & ROUTING PHASE User->>CS: Submit Strategic Task<br/>"Implement AI Transformation" CS->>CS: Analyze Task Type<br/>& Route to Appropriate Process Note over User, COMP: BOARD GOVERNANCE PHASE CS->>BC: Notify Board Chair<br/>Strategic Initiative Request BC->>AC: Request Committee Review<br/>Financial & Risk Assessment AC->>CFO: Financial Impact Analysis AC->>RISK: Risk Assessment Request AC->>COMP: Compliance Review Request Note over User, COMP: EXECUTIVE PLANNING PHASE BC->>CEO: Strategic Planning Session CEO->>CTO: Technology Feasibility Study CEO->>CFO: Budget & Resource Planning CTO->>TD: Technical Architecture Design CFO->>FD: Financial Modeling & Budget Note over User, COMP: DEPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS PHASE TD->>SE: Technical Implementation Plan SE->>SE: Architecture Design<br/>AI Infrastructure Planning FD->>FA: Cost-Benefit Analysis<br/>ROI Calculations FA->>FA: Financial Modeling<br/>Budget Allocation Note over User, COMP: ESG & SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW CS->>ESG: ESG Impact Assessment ESG->>ESG: Environmental Impact<br/>Social Responsibility<br/>Governance Compliance Note over User, COMP: DEMOCRATIC DECISION MAKING CS->>DS: Initiate Democratic Process DS->>BC: Board Discussion & Debate DS->>CEO: Executive Team Input DS->>AC: Committee Recommendations DS->>ESG: ESG Committee Input DS->>RISK: Risk Committee Assessment DS->>COMP: Compliance Committee Review Note over User, COMP: VOTING & CONSENSUS PHASE DS->>DS: Aggregate All Inputs<br/>Weighted Voting Process DS->>BC: Voting Results & Analysis BC->>CS: Final Decision & Authorization Note over User, COMP: IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING CS->>CEO: Implementation Authorization CEO->>CTO: Technology Implementation CEO->>CFO: Budget Release & Monitoring CTO->>TD: Project Kickoff CFO->>FD: Budget Allocation & Tracking Note over User, COMP: EXECUTION & MONITORING PHASE TD->>SE: Development Team Assignment SE->>SE: AI System Development<br/>Infrastructure Setup FD->>FA: Budget Monitoring<br/>Cost Tracking FA->>FA: Financial Reporting<br/>ROI Tracking Note over User, COMP: COMPLIANCE & GOVERNANCE MONITORING CS->>COMP: Ongoing Compliance Monitoring CS->>RISK: Risk Monitoring & Mitigation CS->>ESG: ESG Performance Tracking Note over User, COMP: PROGRESS REPORTING & FEEDBACK SE->>TD: Technical Progress Reports TD->>CTO: Implementation Updates FA->>FD: Financial Performance Reports FD->>CFO: Budget & ROI Updates CTO->>CEO: Technology Status Updates CFO->>CEO: Financial Performance Updates CEO->>BC: Executive Summary Reports BC->>CS: Board Oversight Reports Note over User, COMP: REVIEW & OPTIMIZATION CS->>DS: Performance Review Session DS->>DS: Multi-Stakeholder Feedback<br/>Process Optimization DS->>CS: Recommendations & Improvements Note over User, COMP: COMPLETION & DELIVERY CS->>User: Final Results & Implementation Report<br/>AI Transformation Complete CS->>CS: Update Corporate Status<br/>Record Lessons LearnedCorporate Departmental Workflow Architecture
graph TD subgraph "TASK INTAKE & ROUTING" A[User Task Submission] --> B[CorporateSwarm run method] B --> C{Task Type Analysis} C -->|Strategic| D[Board Governance Process] C -->|Financial| E[Finance Department Process] C -->|Technical| F[Technology Department Process] C -->|Operational| G[Operations Department Process] C -->|Marketing| H[Marketing Department Process] C -->|HR| I[HR Department Process] C -->|Legal| J[Legal Department Process] C -->|R&D| K[R&D Department Process] C -->|Customer| L[Customer Success Process] end subgraph "BOARD GOVERNANCE WORKFLOW" D --> D1[Board Chair Notification] D1 --> D2[Committee Assignment] D2 --> D3[Committee Review] D3 --> D4[Democratic Swarm Discussion] D4 --> D5[Voting & Consensus] D5 --> D6[Board Resolution] D6 --> D7[Executive Implementation] end subgraph "FINANCE DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" E --> E1[Finance Director Assignment] E1 --> E2[Financial Analysis Team] E2 --> E3[Budget Planning] E3 --> E4[Cost-Benefit Analysis] E4 --> E5[ROI Calculations] E5 --> E6[Financial Approval] E6 --> E7[Budget Allocation] E7 --> E8[Financial Monitoring] end subgraph "TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" F --> F1[Technology Director Assignment] F1 --> F2[Technical Architecture Team] F2 --> F3[System Design] F3 --> F4[Development Planning] F4 --> F5[Implementation Team] F5 --> F6[Code Development] F6 --> F7[Testing & QA] F7 --> F8[Deployment & Monitoring] end subgraph "OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" G --> G1[Operations Director Assignment] G1 --> G2[Project Management Team] G2 --> G3[Process Design] G3 --> G4[Resource Planning] G4 --> G5[Implementation Team] G5 --> G6[Process Execution] G6 --> G7[Quality Control] G7 --> G8[Performance Monitoring] end subgraph "MARKETING DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" H --> H1[Marketing Director Assignment] H1 --> H2[Brand Management Team] H2 --> H3[Campaign Planning] H3 --> H4[Content Creation] H4 --> H5[Digital Marketing Team] H5 --> H6[Campaign Execution] H6 --> H7[Analytics & Optimization] H7 --> H8[Performance Reporting] end subgraph "AI AGENT MANAGEMENT WORKFLOW" I --> I1[Agent Management Director Assignment] I1 --> I2[Agent Performance Team] I2 --> I3[Agent Optimization Planning] I3 --> I4[Agent Resource Allocation] I4 --> I5[Agent Deployment Process] I5 --> I6[Agent Training & Development] I6 --> I7[Agent Performance Monitoring] I7 --> I8[Agent Lifecycle Management] end subgraph "LEGAL DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" J --> J1[Legal Director Assignment] J1 --> J2[Legal Analysis Team] J2 --> J3[Compliance Review] J3 --> J4[Risk Assessment] J4 --> J5[Legal Documentation] J5 --> J6[Contract Management] J6 --> J7[Regulatory Compliance] J7 --> J8[Legal Monitoring] end subgraph "R&D DEPARTMENT WORKFLOW" K --> K1[R&D Director Assignment] K1 --> K2[Research Team] K2 --> K3[Research Planning] K3 --> K4[Experimentation] K4 --> K5[Data Analysis] K5 --> K6[Product Development] K6 --> K7[Testing & Validation] K7 --> K8[Innovation Pipeline] end subgraph "CUSTOMER SUCCESS WORKFLOW" L --> L1[Customer Success Director Assignment] L1 --> L2[Customer Success Team] L2 --> L3[Customer Analysis] L3 --> L4[Success Planning] L4 --> L5[Implementation Support] L5 --> L6[Customer Onboarding] L6 --> L7[Success Monitoring] L7 --> L8[Customer Feedback] end subgraph "CROSS-DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION" D7 --> M[Executive Coordination] E8 --> M F8 --> M G8 --> M H8 --> M I8 --> M J8 --> M K8 --> M L8 --> M M --> N[CorporateSwarm Integration] N --> O[Final Results & Reporting] end subgraph "SPECIALIZED GOVERNANCE MONITORING" N --> P[ESG Monitoring] N --> Q[Risk Management] N --> R[Compliance Tracking] N --> S[AI Ethics Review] N --> T[Crisis Management] N --> U[Innovation Pipeline] P --> O Q --> O R --> O S --> O T --> O U --> O endKey Features
run(),arun(), and__call__()methods following Swarms architecture patternsTesting
The implementation includes comprehensive error handling and fallback mechanisms to ensure robust operation even when individual agents encounter issues. The system gracefully handles API failures, parsing errors, and budget constraints while maintaining corporate governance integrity.
This CorporateSwarm implementation provides an exceptional foundation for sophisticated corporate governance simulation and decision-making support systems, representing the highest level of corporate governance simulation available in multi-agent systems.