feat(CategoryTheory): define descent data by presieves#29638
feat(CategoryTheory): define descent data by presieves#29638yuma-mizuno wants to merge 7 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 6b2262238fImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
Are you aware of #24434? |
|
I hadn’t noticed that. Thank you very much for pointing it out. I should wait for #24434. I’ve only worked on this for a few days, so I’m really glad I caught it now. And now I believe I can help with reviewing #24434. It seems that there is a technical difference between describing descent data using a family of arrows versus using a presieve directly. These should correspond via |
|
Perhaps the biggest difference from #24434 is that there the conditions are given by "square diagrams", whereas here the conditions are given by "triangle diagrams" (simple compositions). |
|
One very important difference with our work with @chrisflav is that we make no use of |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
Addendum: I realized that there is prior work in #24434. Since this PR uses a slightly different definition, I plan to make this PR a follow-up to #24434. Until then, I’ll keep it marked as WIP. See the comment: #29638 (comment)