[Merged by Bors] - feat: the left uniformity in a group#35252
[Merged by Bors] - feat: the left uniformity in a group#35252sgouezel wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 43d5379b32Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
| variable {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {l' : Filter β} {f f' : ι → β → α} {g g' : β → α} {s : Set β} | ||
|
|
||
| @[to_additive] | ||
| @[to_additive (attr := to_fun)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are these changes related to (needed for) the main topic of this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No. Let me move them to another PR.
|
Could you please fix CI, then bench it? Otherwise LGTM. Thanks! |
|
!bench |
|
Benchmark results for 31a5330 against 43d5379 are in! @sgouezel
Small changes (3🟥)
|
| In the most common use case ─ quotients of normed additive commutative groups by subgroups ─ | ||
| significant care was taken so that the uniform structure inherent in that setting coincides | ||
| (definitionally) with the uniform structure provided here. -/] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't this not (yet) true because the quotient is equipped with the right uniformity (for now)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, this is premature. Removed. thanks!
|
✌️ sgouezel can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
|
bors r+ |
We have currently a specific definition of the right uniformity of a topological group, but not of the left uniformity. We introduce it in the current PR, for two reasons. First, there is no reason to favor one over the other. Second, it is needed in #35037, which changes the formula for the distance in a normed group to make it left-invariant following standard conventions. We also prove that a group is complete for its left-uniformity iff it is complete for its right-uniformity, by showing that inversion is a uniform equivalence between the two uniformities. Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
We have currently a specific definition of the right uniformity of a topological group, but not of the left uniformity. We introduce it in the current PR, for two reasons. First, there is no reason to favor one over the other. Second, it is needed in #35037, which changes the formula for the distance in a normed group to make it left-invariant following standard conventions.
We also prove that a group is complete for its left-uniformity iff it is complete for its right-uniformity, by showing that inversion is a uniform equivalence between the two uniformities.