Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions LIPs/LIP-9.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
LIP-9 Lens-Wide Verification Process
----

In light of LIP-5, which could/will open up the garden, a process for verified profiles becomes more relevant.

Currently, each Interface/App build on top of the protocol has their own way to verfiy profiles.
That makes it hard for new people to distinguish verified from non-verfied profiles, depending on the platform they got onboarded with
(example: a verified profile on hey doesn't appear as verified on tape)

Also, the newly introduced "reputation score" opens up new possibilities on that front.


Here's an approach to start the discussion:

- The protocol sets up a "database" that holds a list of all verified profiles.
- Each platform can submit to that database, adding new profiles as verifed - in that case, the badge would show "Verified by XYZ" on all platforms that aggregate the list.
- Each platform can choose to aggregate that list, but of course doesn't have to (tho it's recommended).
- If you have a reputation score above a defined threshold, you can apply for a general/lenswide verfication
- A "light verification" can be done individually by going through another process (like linking a github profie, etc...).