Skip to content

fix: update unchecked item icon binary#538

Merged
18202781743 merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
18202781743:master
Oct 16, 2025
Merged

fix: update unchecked item icon binary#538
18202781743 merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
18202781743:master

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the binary file for the unchecked item icon in the bloom icon
set. This change likely involves visual improvements or fixes to the
icon's appearance, such as resolution enhancement, color correction, or
design refinement. The modification ensures the icon renders correctly
and maintains visual consistency with the overall design system.

Influence:

  1. Verify the unchecked item icon displays correctly in all supported
    contexts
  2. Check for visual artifacts or rendering issues at different sizes
  3. Confirm the icon maintains consistency with other icons in the bloom
    set
  4. Test the icon in both light and dark themes if applicable
  5. Validate the icon appears properly in all UI components that use it

fix: 更新未选中项目图标二进制文件

更新了bloom图标集中未选中项目图标的二进制文件。此更改可能涉及图标外观的
视觉改进或修复,例如分辨率提升、颜色校正或设计优化。该修改确保图标正确渲
染并与整体设计系统保持视觉一致性。

Influence:

  1. 验证未选中项目图标在所有支持的上下文中正确显示
  2. 检查不同尺寸下是否存在视觉伪影或渲染问题
  3. 确认该图标与bloom集中的其他图标保持一致性
  4. 在明暗主题下测试图标显示效果(如适用)
  5. 验证使用该图标的所有UI组件中图标显示正常

Updated the binary file for the unchecked item icon in the bloom icon
set. This change likely involves visual improvements or fixes to the
icon's appearance, such as resolution enhancement, color correction, or
design refinement. The modification ensures the icon renders correctly
and maintains visual consistency with the overall design system.

Influence:
1. Verify the unchecked item icon displays correctly in all supported
contexts
2. Check for visual artifacts or rendering issues at different sizes
3. Confirm the icon maintains consistency with other icons in the bloom
set
4. Test the icon in both light and dark themes if applicable
5. Validate the icon appears properly in all UI components that use it

fix: 更新未选中项目图标二进制文件

更新了bloom图标集中未选中项目图标的二进制文件。此更改可能涉及图标外观的
视觉改进或修复,例如分辨率提升、颜色校正或设计优化。该修改确保图标正确渲
染并与整体设计系统保持视觉一致性。

Influence:
1. 验证未选中项目图标在所有支持的上下文中正确显示
2. 检查不同尺寸下是否存在视觉伪影或渲染问题
3. 确认该图标与bloom集中的其他图标保持一致性
4. 在明暗主题下测试图标显示效果(如适用)
5. 验证使用该图标的所有UI组件中图标显示正常
@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy October 15, 2025 08:49
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#538
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

根据提供的diff信息,我看到这是一个二进制文件(.dci文件)的差异比较。由于是二进制文件,diff输出只能显示文件是否不同,而不能显示具体的文本差异。

从diff信息中我可以观察到:

  1. 文件路径:src/icons/bloom/item_unchecked.dci
  2. 文件从索引 d17d16f3 更新为 77997c99
  3. 文件模式保持不变(100644)
  4. 文件内容确实发生了变化(Binary files ... differ)

由于这是二进制文件,我无法直接分析其内容变更的具体细节。不过,我可以提供一些关于处理二进制文件差异的一般性建议:

  1. 版本控制考虑:

    • 对于二进制文件,考虑使用 Git LFS (Large File Storage) 来管理,特别是当这些文件较大时
    • 确保团队成员都正确配置了 Git LFS,避免出现文件损坏或下载不完整的问题
  2. 文件更新建议:

    • 在更新二进制资源文件时,确保新文件确实比旧版本有改进
    • 考虑建立二进制文件的版本控制和更新流程,避免不必要的频繁变更
  3. 团队协作:

    • 对于图标等二进制资源文件,最好指定专人负责更新和维护
    • 建立图标资源的使用文档,说明每个图标的用途和适用场景
  4. 文件管理:

    • 考虑为图标等资源文件建立命名规范,便于管理和查找
    • 定期审查和清理不再使用的图标资源,减少仓库体积

由于无法直接查看二进制文件的具体内容变更,建议您直接查看文件本身或联系负责更新此文件的团队成员,了解具体的变更内容和原因。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy, pengfeixx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 725e505 into linuxdeepin:master Oct 16, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
18202781743 pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#538
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants