Skip to content

Conversation

@A-CGray
Copy link
Member

@A-CGray A-CGray commented Nov 17, 2025

Purpose

Expected time until merged

Type of change

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
  • Documentation update
  • Maintenance update
  • Other (please describe)

Testing

Checklist

  • I have run ruff check and ruff format to make sure the Python code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
  • I have formatted the Fortran code with fprettify or C/C++ code with clang-format as applicable
  • I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
  • I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.24%. Comparing base (a86e9d9) to head (7cebe69).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #107      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.31%   73.24%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         757      755       -2     
==========================================
- Hits          555      553       -2     
  Misses        202      202              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@A-CGray A-CGray changed the title Update petsc Support PETSc >= 3.22 Nov 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants