Skip to content

MatcherClass support for complex matching#52

Open
grosmar wants to merge 3 commits intomisprintt:masterfrom
grosmar:master
Open

MatcherClass support for complex matching#52
grosmar wants to merge 3 commits intomisprintt:masterfrom
grosmar:master

Conversation

@grosmar
Copy link

@grosmar grosmar commented Jan 21, 2016

Hi,

I've extended your Matcher enum with a new type: matcherClass

This way you can provide classes instead of just functions.

Also created a MatcherClass typedef for it, so the system is independent from any concrete implementation.

I did it to use hamcrest for argument checking, this way i call use all the crazy hamcrest Matchers for checking the conditions.

The usage is pretty simple after:
someMock.someFunction(cast matcherClass(endsWith("Bar")));

And as an addition I've removed the warning, if there is no munit defined, because it works with any test runner that is based on annotations. (like hexUnit https://github.com/DoclerLabs/hexUnit).

I want to modify later the macro to be able to receive configuration for the annotation and field names from outside.

I hope you like the modification.

Cheers,
Balazs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant