Closed
Conversation
This brings down `su-exec` to 11kB and `su-exec-static` to 853kB on my Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64.
Static linking to GNU libc is not really allowed, and I am using GNU libc for my purposes (running Java on CentOS and Fedora). Being able to do "make install" makes packaging su-exec as an RPM easier.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/1158 used as reference.
Closed
Contributor
Author
|
@ncopa What are you waiting for before merging this pull request? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull requests adds a man page as well as modifying the Makefile to install it.
It in-cooperates Makefile changes made by two others persons as well. The changes from one of them is pending as pull request 11, I am happy to let that pull request go in first and then rebase mine.