-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
[nrf noup] Make fprotect area span only MCUBoot #576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rlubos
merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:main
from
ahasztag:NCSIDB-1734_fprotect_boundaries_fix
Nov 25, 2025
Merged
[nrf noup] Make fprotect area span only MCUBoot #576
rlubos
merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:main
from
ahasztag:NCSIDB-1734_fprotect_boundaries_fix
Nov 25, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
de-nordic
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
tomchy
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
Do not merge - there are issues on the sdk-nrf manifest update PR |
1d93c0c to
7854338
Compare
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
7854338 to
b984f2f
Compare
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
b984f2f to
bedb2ab
Compare
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
nvlsianpu
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
bedb2ab to
009d375
Compare
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
009d375 to
3ea4ecd
Compare
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] treewide: add NCS partition manager support This commit changes the fprotect area size definition. This is necessary, as if TFM is used, tfm_storage is placed between mcuboot and the application. The old implementation led to the protected fprotect area including both MCUBoot and tfm_storage. This was unnecessary and in case of nRF54L15 (where the maximum FPROTECT area is small) not being able to use FPROTECT in case TF-M was used. Signed-off-by: Artur Hadasz <artur.hadasz@nordicsemi.no>
3ea4ecd to
481dc65
Compare
|
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
NordicBuilder
added a commit
to NordicBuilder/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
rlubos
pushed a commit
to nrfconnect/sdk-nrf
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-mcuboot#576 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <pylon@nordicsemi.no>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



nrf-squash! [nrf noup] treewide: add NCS partition manager support
This commit changes the fprotect area size definition. This is necessary, as if TFM is used, tfm_storage is placed between mcuboot and the application. The old implementation led to the protected fprotect area including both
MCUBoot and tfm_storage. This was unnecessary and
in case of nRF54L15 (where the maximum FPROTECT area is small) not being able to use FPROTECT in case TF-M was used.