Add control parameter for generators and storage units

[ClaraBuettner]

Contributes to #572 .

Depends on #550

Before merging into dev-branch, please make sure that

• the CHANGELOG.rst was updated.
• new and adjusted code is formated using black and isort.
• the Dataset-version is updated when existing datasets are adjusted.
• the branch was merged into the continuous-integration/run-everything-over-the-weekend- branch.
• the workflow is running successful in test mode.
• the workflow is running successful in Everything mode.

[ClaraBuettner]

The control parameter was not set correctly for generator components. I fixed this, tested it in test mode and merged the branch again in the CI-branch.

[ClaraBuettner]

@khelfen: Do you know if you need such parameters in edisgo?

[khelfen]

@khelfen: Do you know if you need such parameters in edisgo?

Yeah, they are used in eDisGo 👍

[ClaraBuettner]

Yeah, they are used in eDisGo 👍

And do you also rely on the data coming from eGon-data or do you set them differently in eDisGo?

[khelfen]

Yeah, they are used in eDisGo 👍

And do you also rely on the data coming from eGon-data or do you set them differently in eDisGo?

I just rechecked: currently, the control parameter is not retrieved from the database — eDisGo defaults to "PQ" control for all generator types. I think it would be more robust to define this explicitly in eGon-data and load it via the DB in eDisGo, but the current default works.

To be honest, I'm not sure how much the different control settings influence the power flow results.

@nesnoj how is this handled in ding0?

Relevant code snippets in eDisGo:

Data retrieval:

• generators_import.py, L836–855
• generators_import.py, L881–904
• generators_import.py, L913–934

Default values:

• generators_import.py, L1177
• topology.py, L1169–1186

---

Möchtest du eine noch technischere oder neutralere Tonalität?