Skip to content

HYPERFLEET-779 - feat: add E2E test case automation skill to devtools plugin#26

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift-hyperfleet:mainfrom
yingzhanredhat:ying-skill
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

HYPERFLEET-779 - feat: add E2E test case automation skill to devtools plugin#26
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift-hyperfleet:mainfrom
yingzhanredhat:ying-skill

Conversation

@yingzhanredhat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yingzhanredhat yingzhanredhat commented Apr 2, 2026

Summary

  • HYPERFLEET-779 : Claude plugin for E2E test automation

Test Plan

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • make test-all passes
  • make lint passes
  • Helm chart changes validated with make test-helm (if applicable)
  • Deployed to a development cluster and verified (if Helm/config changes)
  • E2E tests passed (if cross-component or major changes)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • E2E Test Automation: generates/updates Ginkgo/Gomega E2E tests from test-case documents, handling setup, teardown, assertions, and keeping test metadata in sync.
  • Documentation

    • Detailed E2E guidance: compatibility rules, phased automation workflow, Tier0 (pre-deployed adapters) and Tier1/Tier2 (test-specific adapters) patterns, checklists, templates, and examples.
  • Chores

    • Project metadata updated to version 0.5.0.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from aredenba-rh and yasun1 April 2, 2026 11:21
@yingzhanredhat yingzhanredhat changed the title HYPERFLEET-779 - feat: add E2E test case automation skill to devtool… HYPERFLEET-779 - feat: add E2E test case automation skill to devtools plugin Apr 2, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review

Walkthrough

This PR bumps the plugin version to 0.5.0, adds an E2E Test Automation entry to the README (including CLI/tool name and metadata updates), and introduces a new e2e-test-automation skill with three documents: SKILL.md (automation workflow, compatibility ladder, phased control flow, and output templates), tier0-automation-logic.md (Tier0 constraints, adapter rules, and standardized control flow), and tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md (per-test adapter deployment lifecycle, patterns, and mapping to Ginkgo/Gomega).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User (test author)
    participant Tool as E2E Test Automation Tool
    participant Repo as Codebase (pkg/, e2e/)
    participant Deploy as Deploy Scripts / Env
    participant Runner as Ginkgo/Gomega Runner
    participant Cluster as Kubernetes / Adapters

    User->>Tool: submit test-case document
    Tool->>Repo: inspect pkg/ helpers, wrappers, existing tests
    Tool-->>Tool: classify scenario (new vs update) and tier
    alt Tier1/Tier2
        Tool->>Deploy: trigger adapter deploy scripts (BeforeEach)
        Deploy->>Cluster: deploy adapter(s)
        Cluster->>Deploy: report readiness/registration
        Deploy->>Tool: report readiness
    end
    Tool->>Tool: generate or update Ginkgo/Gomega test (It/BeforeEach/AfterEach)
    Tool->>Runner: provide run instructions or execute focused It()
    Runner->>Cluster: perform API calls and adapter interactions
    Cluster->>Runner: return results and conditions
    Runner->>Tool: deliver test artifacts & outcomes
    alt Tier1/Tier2
        Tool->>Deploy: trigger adapter undeploy scripts (AfterEach)
        Deploy->>Cluster: remove test-specific adapter(s)
    end
    Tool->>User: deliver generated/updated code and run command
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically summarizes the main change: adding an E2E test case automation skill to the devtools plugin. It is concise, specific to the actual changeset, and directly reflects the primary contribution.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`:
- Around line 36-37: The doc must require pre-validation of adapter names before
any shell invocation: update the spec around deploy-scripts/deploy-adapter.sh
and every mention of `<adapter-name>` (including the other referenced sections)
to state that adapter names MUST be validated against a strict allowlist/regex
and passed only as a single positional argument (no string concatenation or
interpolation into shell commands), and add a short recommended validation rule
(e.g., allowed characters and length) and an explicit note to reject or fail CI
on any name that does not match before calling deploy-scripts/deploy-adapter.sh.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 72375e99-789b-4308-83fa-9eced2c019e3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a41dad and 4996c7a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md (1)

34-37: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Require strict adapter-name validation before any command usage.

The spec still allows adapter names to flow from test-case docs into shell/script patterns without a mandatory validation contract. Please require: strict allowlist regex + max length, pass only as a single positional arg (no interpolation), and fail fast (including CI) on mismatch. This is the root cause; it affects downstream command examples (e.g., Line 141, Line 256, Line 275).

Proposed doc hardening
 ### 2. Adapter Name from Test Case Document

 The test case document should specify which adapter to use. Adapter names are NOT hardcoded in the skill.
+Before any command/script invocation, adapter names MUST be validated against a strict allowlist
+(for example: `^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]{0,61}[a-z0-9])?$`, max 63 chars).
+If validation fails, stop generation/execution and fail CI for that test case.
+When invoking scripts, pass the validated adapter name only as a single positional argument
+(never by shell string concatenation/interpolation).

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`
around lines 34 - 37, Update the "Adapter Name from Test Case Document" handling
to enforce strict validation: require adapter names to match a defined allowlist
regex (e.g., /^[a-z0-9_-]{1,32}$/) and a clear max-length, accept them only as a
single positional argument (no interpolation into other strings or flags), and
add fail-fast behavior so invalid names cause immediate CI/test failure; apply
these checks to all places that consume adapter names in the doc/scripts/command
examples (the adapter name usage in the Adapter Name section and the downstream
command examples referenced in the comment) and document the exact regex and
max-length contract so callers know the validation rules.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Duplicate comments:
In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`:
- Around line 34-37: Update the "Adapter Name from Test Case Document" handling
to enforce strict validation: require adapter names to match a defined allowlist
regex (e.g., /^[a-z0-9_-]{1,32}$/) and a clear max-length, accept them only as a
single positional argument (no interpolation into other strings or flags), and
add fail-fast behavior so invalid names cause immediate CI/test failure; apply
these checks to all places that consume adapter names in the doc/scripts/command
examples (the adapter name usage in the Adapter Name section and the downstream
command examples referenced in the comment) and document the exact regex and
max-length contract so callers know the validation rules.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 687cdc89-374e-4082-8682-73b4e945673f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4996c7a and b5b69a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md

Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/README.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xueli181114 xueli181114 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few additional findings beyond existing comments.

Summary:

  • 1 placeholder inconsistency across docs
  • 1 deploy method contradiction within same doc
  • 1 compatibility ladder violation in example code
  • 1 README claim vs reality mismatch
  • 1 overly broad grep suggestion

Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md (2)

141-141: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Unify deployment guidance: helper API vs bash script is contradictory.

Line 141 and Lines 272-276 prescribe helper-based deployment, but Line 256 switches to bash deployment. Pick one canonical approach (prefer helper path if that is the intended standard) and align all mapping/examples to it.

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

Also applies to: 256-256, 272-276

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`
at line 141, The documentation currently mixes two deployment methods; unify to
the helper API by replacing the bash deployment examples with the helper call
h.DeployAdapter(ctx, deployOpts) everywhere (including the snippet that now
shows a bash script) and update any associated expectations (e.g.,
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())) and parameters to match the helper's
signature; remove or mark the bash script alternative as deprecated to ensure
all mappings/examples consistently demonstrate the canonical helper-based
deployment flow.

36-37: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Require strict adapter-name validation before any shell-based deploy step.

Lines 36-37 and Line 256 allow adapter names sourced from test docs to flow into shell commands without a mandatory validation contract. This should explicitly require allowlist validation (e.g., ^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?$ + max length) and fail generation/CI on mismatch before invocation.

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

Also applies to: 256-257

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`
around lines 36 - 37, Ensure any adapter name taken from test docs is validated
against an allowlist before being used in shell command invocations: implement a
strict validator that enforces the regex ^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?$ and a
configured max-length, apply it at the boundary where the "adapter" value is
parsed/consumed (i.e., immediately before any shell-based deploy step or command
construction that uses the adapter variable), and fail generation/CI with a
clear error if the value does not match so no unvalidated adapter can flow into
shell invocations.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`:
- Around line 118-120: Placeholders in the template use mismatched delimiters
(e.g., "<adapter-name from test case document}" and
"testdata/adapter-configs/<adapter-name}/") which makes copying error-prone; fix
by normalizing the placeholder syntax across the document (choose one style and
apply it consistently) — for example, replace the mixed "<adapter-name from test
case document}" and "testdata/adapter-configs/<adapter-name}/" occurrences (and
the similar occurrence around the later placeholder) so they all use the same
delimiters like <adapter-name> (or alternatively {adapter-name}) throughout.

---

Duplicate comments:
In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`:
- Line 141: The documentation currently mixes two deployment methods; unify to
the helper API by replacing the bash deployment examples with the helper call
h.DeployAdapter(ctx, deployOpts) everywhere (including the snippet that now
shows a bash script) and update any associated expectations (e.g.,
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())) and parameters to match the helper's
signature; remove or mark the bash script alternative as deprecated to ensure
all mappings/examples consistently demonstrate the canonical helper-based
deployment flow.
- Around line 36-37: Ensure any adapter name taken from test docs is validated
against an allowlist before being used in shell command invocations: implement a
strict validator that enforces the regex ^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?$ and a
configured max-length, apply it at the boundary where the "adapter" value is
parsed/consumed (i.e., immediately before any shell-based deploy step or command
construction that uses the adapter variable), and fail generation/CI with a
clear error if the value does not match so no unvalidated adapter can flow into
shell invocations.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c91c7602-24f7-423d-918e-3d0e17e7cc6c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5b69a7 and 53498ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md

Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md (2)

141-149: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Unify deployment guidance (helper API vs raw shell) to avoid contradictory implementation paths.

This file still mixes helper-based lifecycle (h.DeployAdapter, h.UninstallAdapter) with raw shell-based mapping examples (deploy-adapter.sh), which makes the contract ambiguous for generated tests.

Suggested normalization
-| Deploy failure-simulation adapter | Bash: deploy-adapter.sh cl-failure-sim |
+| Deploy failure-simulation adapter | h.DeployAdapter(ctx, deployOpts) |
@@
-| Verify top-level status reflects failure | GetCluster(), check Ready=False, verify failure message |
+| Verify top-level status reflects failure | GetCluster(), check Ready=False, verify failure message |

(If shell is intentionally allowed here, state that exception explicitly and consistently in this doc and SKILL.md.)

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

Also applies to: 256-260

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`
around lines 141 - 149, This doc mixes helper-based lifecycle calls
(h.DeployAdapter, h.UninstallAdapter, h.CleanupTest<Resource>) with raw shell
examples (deploy-adapter.sh) causing ambiguity; pick and document one canonical
approach and update references accordingly: either (A) standardize the guide to
use the helper API everywhere by replacing shell snippets and examples with
h.DeployAdapter/h.UninstallAdapter/h.CleanupTest<Resource> usage and examples,
or (B) explicitly state an exception that raw shell scripts are allowed and add
a clear section in this doc and SKILL.md describing when/why deploy-adapter.sh
is permitted and how it maps to the helper calls; ensure all instances
(including the "Teardown (AfterEach)" and verification steps) consistently
reference the chosen approach and remove contradictory examples.

34-37: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Require adapter-name validation before any deploy script invocation.

Adapter names are taken from test-case docs and then used in command-oriented deployment flow, but this spec still doesn’t require strict pre-validation/rejection. That leaves command-injection risk in generated automation paths.

Proposed doc hardening
 ### 2. Adapter Name from Test Case Document

 The test case document should specify which adapter to use. Adapter names are NOT hardcoded in the skill.
+Before using any adapter name in deployment/undeployment commands, validate it with a strict allowlist rule
+(example: `^[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]{0,61}[a-z0-9])?$`).
+If validation fails, reject input and fail automation/CI immediately.

@@
 **1. Deploy Test-Specific Adapter (BeforeEach)**
-- Use deployment scripts to deploy adapter
+- Validate adapter name first, then deploy adapter as a single positional argument (no interpolation)

@@
-| Deploy failure-simulation adapter | Bash: deploy-adapter.sh cl-failure-sim |
+| Deploy failure-simulation adapter | Validate `cl-failure-sim` then run deploy command with positional arg only |

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

Also applies to: 84-87, 256-257

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`
around lines 34 - 37, The spec currently allows adapter names from test-case
documents to flow directly into deployment commands; add strict pre-validation
before any deploy script invocation by implementing a whitelist check and
rejection path for adapter names referenced in the "Adapter Name from Test Case
Document" section and wherever the command-oriented deployment flow consumes
test-case docs; ensure the deploy orchestration (the function or routine that
builds/executes deployment commands) validates adapter-name against an allowed
set, rejects or fails fast with a clear error for unknown/unsafe values, and
applies input sanitization/escaping for any remaining runtime use to prevent
command-injection.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Duplicate comments:
In
`@hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md`:
- Around line 141-149: This doc mixes helper-based lifecycle calls
(h.DeployAdapter, h.UninstallAdapter, h.CleanupTest<Resource>) with raw shell
examples (deploy-adapter.sh) causing ambiguity; pick and document one canonical
approach and update references accordingly: either (A) standardize the guide to
use the helper API everywhere by replacing shell snippets and examples with
h.DeployAdapter/h.UninstallAdapter/h.CleanupTest<Resource> usage and examples,
or (B) explicitly state an exception that raw shell scripts are allowed and add
a clear section in this doc and SKILL.md describing when/why deploy-adapter.sh
is permitted and how it maps to the helper calls; ensure all instances
(including the "Teardown (AfterEach)" and verification steps) consistently
reference the chosen approach and remove contradictory examples.
- Around line 34-37: The spec currently allows adapter names from test-case
documents to flow directly into deployment commands; add strict pre-validation
before any deploy script invocation by implementing a whitelist check and
rejection path for adapter names referenced in the "Adapter Name from Test Case
Document" section and wherever the command-oriented deployment flow consumes
test-case docs; ensure the deploy orchestration (the function or routine that
builds/executes deployment commands) validates adapter-name against an allowed
set, rejects or fails fast with a clear error for unknown/unsafe values, and
applies input sanitization/escaping for any remaining runtime use to prevent
command-injection.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 21b7874f-551f-42d3-bb66-723bcf3fe20b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53498ce and 5465262.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier0-automation-logic.md
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/tier1-tier2-automation-logic.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • hyperfleet-devtools/README.md

Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/skills/e2e-test-automation/SKILL.md Outdated
Comment thread hyperfleet-devtools/README.md Outdated
@xueli181114
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 8, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 8, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xueli181114

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Apr 8, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e103714 into openshift-hyperfleet:main Apr 8, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants