-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
OCPBUGS-60532: Allowlist controller: add node reconciler to sync allowlist on node creation #2858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
karampok
wants to merge
5
commits into
openshift:master
Choose a base branch
from
karampok:node-creation-support
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09e6f85
Allowlist controller: refactor names in controller code
karampok b299f62
Allowlist controller: remove unused configmap template
karampok 21c055d
Allowlist controller: remove unused scheme field
karampok 74e0cb5
Allowlist controller: inline single-use helper functions
karampok f709c58
Allowlist controller: add node reconciler to sync allowlist on node c…
karampok File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
createObjectsFrom fails on AlreadyExists instead of being idempotent.
When creating objects, if any already exists, the function returns an error. This could cause issues during reconciliation if the ConfigMap was partially created. Consider ignoring
AlreadyExistserrors to make the operation idempotent.for _, obj := range manifests { - if err := client.Default().CRClient().Create(ctx, obj); err != nil { + if err := client.Default().CRClient().Create(ctx, obj); err != nil && !apierrors.IsAlreadyExists(err) { return errors.Wrapf(err, "error creating %s %s/%s", obj.GroupVersionKind(), obj.GetNamespace(), obj.GetName()) } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents