Skip to content

Conversation

@RH-csaggin
Copy link

Missing a dot(.) to correctly point to the utils file in below folder

Missing a dot(.) to correctly point to the utils file in below folder
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from s1061123 and zshi-redhat May 26, 2025 08:39
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RH-csaggin
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign pliurh for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Forced podman pull with [--arch=amd64] option to make it compatible with macOS
added missing dot(.) form source utils
fi

CONTAINER=$($CONTAINER_ENGINE run -t -d --entrypoint /bin/bash quay.io/openshift/origin-ovn-kubernetes:latest)
CONTAINER=$($CONTAINER_ENGINE run --arch=amd64 -t -d --entrypoint /bin/bash quay.io/openshift/origin-ovn-kubernetes:latest)
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have to adapt this to run in MacOS

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which should not affect any other OS as there are not other images arch

@RH-csaggin
Copy link
Author

Any update on this @zshi-redhat @s1061123 ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@RH-csaggin: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 10, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants