OADP-7143: update runc requirement

[weshayutin]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@weshayutin: This pull request references OADP-7143 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)

• do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: weshayutin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [weshayutin]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[weshayutin]

@mpryc @kaovilai please check me here :) Thank you!

[openshift-ci]

@weshayutin: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[kaovilai]

I would not recommend using replace for this.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/for-this-should-we-use-go-get-SGN5yzckSj.zb9VDYTeTcw#0

[kaovilai]

even so.. 1.1.12 is the version already used at base branch... and is not new enough to contain the patched versions mentioned in advisory.

[kaovilai]

Since we have no direct dependency on runc (it's not in go.mod) this is technically a false positive report.

ie.. this is based off go sum and not go mod.

[kaovilai]

false positive

/hold