Skip to content

fix: make rule to identify high confidence indications more strict#68

Merged
DSuveges merged 3 commits intomainfrom
il-clinical-fix
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

fix: make rule to identify high confidence indications more strict#68
DSuveges merged 3 commits intomainfrom
il-clinical-fix

Conversation

@ireneisdoomed
Copy link
Contributor

This important piece of business logic got dropped at some point last week during the commit shuffling in the clinical branch.

@ireneisdoomed ireneisdoomed requested a review from DSuveges March 2, 2026 11:52
Copy link
Contributor

@DSuveges DSuveges left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! All makes sense. According to the updated filter, we keep indication either if both the drugs and diseases lists contains only one element OR the clinical stage is approved or pre-approved.

@DSuveges DSuveges merged commit 40ede9f into main Mar 2, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants