Skip to content

Conversation

@sarthak0806
Copy link

@sarthak0806 sarthak0806 commented Dec 22, 2025

Actually, we are unable to open the preview of this .ipynb file due to missing "state" variables in metadata.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated notebook metadata structure to improve consistency and maintainability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Walkthrough

A notebook metadata entry is updated by adding an empty "state" object to the first code cell's configuration in the Jupyter notebook JSON, with no functional impact on code, execution, or logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Notebook Metadata Update
DeepSeek-finetuning/Fine_tune_DeepSeek.ipynb
Added empty execution state object ("state": {}) to first code cell's metadata in notebook JSON

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Metadata-only change with no functional impact
  • Single file affected with minimal, localized edit

Poem

🐰 A state object, empty and neat,
Nestled in metadata so sweet,
No logic to break, no code to refine,
Just JSON's way of keeping in line.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'State is updated' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't clearly indicate the specific change being made (adding state metadata to notebook). Use a more descriptive title like 'Add state metadata to DeepSeek notebook' or 'Fix notebook metadata by adding state object' to clearly convey the nature and purpose of the change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 93c06c3 and 1dce994.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • DeepSeek-finetuning/Fine_tune_DeepSeek.ipynb
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • DeepSeek-finetuning/Fine_tune_DeepSeek.ipynb

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant