Skip to content

improve/fix the logging of huge pages#97

Merged
k-rister merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hugepages-logging-fix
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

improve/fix the logging of huge pages#97
k-rister merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hugepages-logging-fix

Conversation

@k-rister
Copy link
Contributor

@k-rister k-rister commented Jul 1, 2025

  • support any number of NUMA nodes

  • support multiple huge page sizes

  • support any huge page size

- support any number of NUMA nodes

- support multiple huge page sizes

- support any huge page size
@k-rister k-rister requested a review from a team July 1, 2025 20:09
@k-rister k-rister self-assigned this Jul 1, 2025
@k-rister k-rister added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 1, 2025
@project-crucible-tracking project-crucible-tracking bot moved this from Queued to In Progress in Crucible Tracking Jul 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@rafaelfolco rafaelfolco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@k-rister k-rister merged commit 2354d57 into main Jul 8, 2025
330 of 346 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Crucible Tracking Jul 8, 2025
@k-rister k-rister deleted the hugepages-logging-fix branch July 8, 2025 01:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

the per-node-hugepage logging code needs to be more generic and handle multiple page sizes and variable node counts

2 participants