Skip to content

Conversation

@cruizen
Copy link
Contributor

@cruizen cruizen commented Oct 26, 2023

No description provided.

mithilarun
mithilarun previously approved these changes Oct 26, 2023
Update image org:name
`docker build` was failing since `Dockerfile` is in `./container` and not `.`
@cruizen
Copy link
Contributor Author

cruizen commented Oct 27, 2023

@Sanket36 This action fails because it is unable to download the base image from artifactory

ERROR: failed to solve: DeadlineExceeded: DeadlineExceeded: DeadlineExceeded: artifactory.platform9.horse/docker-local/pf9-py39-baseimg-alpine:stable: failed to do request: Head "https://artifactory.platform9.horse/v2/docker-local/pf9-py39-baseimg-alpine/manifests/stable": dial tcp 52.27.199.157:443: i/o timeout
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

@cruizen cruizen requested a review from sanket-l October 27, 2023 08:30
@cruizen cruizen marked this pull request as draft October 27, 2023 09:04
@cruizen
Copy link
Contributor Author

cruizen commented Oct 27, 2023

Since the artifactory images are on pf9 VPN, we have to hold the Trivy GitHub actions for repositories (Docker images) that use pf9-py39-base-image or pf9-py39-build-image as base image - unless we can make the images in artifactory public! (or even move them to qyay.io?)

@cruizen
Copy link
Contributor Author

cruizen commented Sep 3, 2025

Since the artifactory images are on pf9 VPN, we have to hold the Trivy GitHub actions for repositories (Docker images) that use pf9-py39-base-image or pf9-py39-build-image as base image - unless we can make the images in artifactory public! (or even move them to qyay.io?)

cc: @hsri-pf9

@cruizen cruizen requested a review from hsri-pf9 September 3, 2025 04:56
@hsri-pf9
Copy link
Contributor

hsri-pf9 commented Sep 3, 2025

We have two options either we can skip trivy scans for repos that use pf9 artifactory images or make it public. There is already present trivy scan in the main


this always runs trivy fs on the filesystem so it does not depend on building/pulling the base Docker image. But if we want to add image scan job like this PR then we will hit VPN problem and either have to skip or make the image public

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants