Skip to content

Conversation

@quic-kdybcio
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ekanshibu
Copy link
Contributor

Please add some more details for the change(in PR description or commit text)

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 11, 2025
Newer compiler versions include various improvements, ranging from
codegen and support for newer arch extensions to improved warning
messages, which help keep the code less buggy.

Stop using the six year old GCC 7.5, in favor of using whatever newest
revision the distribution decides to ship.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
@ekanshibu
Copy link
Contributor

@quic-kdybcio can you please rebase on top of development branch?

@quic-kdybcio
Copy link
Contributor Author

The vanilla GCC part doesn't apply anymore (apart from a leftover rm linaro-gcc in .github/workflows/sync_build.yml).. For ubuntu-latest, I'm now debating whether we should switch to -latest, or maybe carry a matrix of e.g. {22.04, latest(=24.04)}.. which one would you prefer?

@ekanshibu
Copy link
Contributor

The vanilla GCC part doesn't apply anymore (apart from a leftover rm linaro-gcc in .github/workflows/sync_build.yml).. For ubuntu-latest, I'm now debating whether we should switch to -latest, or maybe carry a matrix of e.g. {22.04, latest(=24.04)}.. which one would you prefer?

@quic-mtharu, would need your suggestions here. I believe earlier it was ubuntu-latest and then it was moved to ubuntu-22.04 due to some upgrade issues.

@quic-mtharu
Copy link
Contributor

@ekanshibu and @quic-kdybcio, Let’s keep using ubuntu-22.04 for now.
It’s stable, consistent across our CI, and avoids unexpected breakages when ubuntu-latest upgrades to a new major version.
We can move to the next stable Ubuntu release when we actually need new features or toolchain updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants