Skip to content

Conversation

@gbenhaim
Copy link
Member

ArgoCD started to complain about application that specify the default namespace in their manifest. This change won't change the actual namespace services are deployed to, since we already mentioned the namespace as part of the kustomization for all of them.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Gemini AI Assistant Available

Hi @gbenhaim! I'm here to help with your pull request. You can interact with me using the following commands:

Available Commands

  • @gemini-cli /review - Request a comprehensive code review

    • Example: @gemini-cli /review Please focus on security and performance
  • @gemini-cli <your question> - Ask me anything about the codebase

    • Example: @gemini-cli How can I improve this function?
    • Example: @gemini-cli What are the best practices for error handling here?

How to Use

  1. Simply type one of the commands above in a comment on this PR
  2. I'll analyze your code and provide detailed feedback
  3. You can track my progress in the workflow logs

Permissions

Only OWNER, MEMBER, or COLLABORATOR users can trigger my responses. This ensures secure and appropriate usage.


This message was automatically added to help you get started with the Gemini AI assistant. Feel free to delete this comment if you don't need assistance.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Hi @gbenhaim, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

@oswcab oswcab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

ArgoCD started to complain about application that specify the default
namespace in their manifest. This change won't change the actual
namespace services are deployed to, since we already mentioned the
namespace as part of the kustomization for all of them.

Signed-off-by: Gal Ben Haim <gbenhaim@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Nov 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@oswcab oswcab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Nov 20, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gbenhaim, oswcab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hugares
Copy link
Contributor

hugares commented Nov 20, 2025

/lgtm

@gbenhaim
Copy link
Member Author

/test

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2025

@gbenhaim: The /test command needs one or more targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test appstudio-e2e-tests
/test appstudio-load-test

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test appstudio-hac-e2e-tests
/test appstudio-upgrade-tests
/test konflux-e2e-v418-optional

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-redhat-appstudio-infra-deployments-main-appstudio-e2e-tests

In response to this:

/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hugares
Copy link
Contributor

hugares commented Nov 20, 2025

/retest

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a4d300e into redhat-appstudio:main Nov 20, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants