Added Confidence Argument to keypoint detection model

[Greenstan]

Description

A new "Confidence" argument has been added to the keypoint detection model (based on the confidence argument found in the object detection model)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?

A Dedicated keypoint detection model test file has been made with multiple test cases including one where the confidence is changed

Any specific deployment considerations

Docs

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
2 out of 3 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ Greenstan
✅ SolomonLake
❌ pre-commit-ci[bot]
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[SolomonLake]

can you make sure you are running the tests locally using python3 -m unittest (or python) from the root of repo?

You can see test failures here: https://github.com/roboflow/roboflow-python/actions/runs/16078304796/job/45497459911?pr=354

I left suggested fixes which are all going to be necessary.

[Greenstan]

@SolomonLake The Local path issues have been updated according to your suggestions as well as the switch to "with self.assertRaises(Exception):" and the env api-key variable.

[Greenstan]

All tests are now successful. The issue was with some referenced file paths

[SolomonLake]

Looks good to me, and tested it locally. Thanks for the contribution!