fix: release build fixes

[WRRicht3r]

Summary

• Flow diffing now always subtracts the previous collection from the new set (common/src/main/java/jp/co/soramitsu/common/utils/FlowExt.kt:97), so elements replaced without changing list size are reported in removed, satisfying FlowExtKtTest.testDiffed.
• The crypto detail formatter keeps high precision for millions while reverting the extreme-trillion case to the short formatter to avoid overlong decimals (common/src/main/java/jp/co/soramitsu/common/utils/NumberFormatters.kt:123). This still preserves the added precision for the other brackets but caps the final test case at three decimals as expected.

Related Issue

Closes # (or) Relates to #

Type of Change

• feat (new feature)
• fix (bug fix)
• refactor (no functional change)
• chore/build (tooling, CI, deps)
• docs (README/AGENTS, comments)

Screenshots / Videos

If UI changes, include before/after.

Test Plan

Commands run locally:

./gradlew detektAll
./gradlew runTest
./gradlew :app:lint

Additional checks and scenarios covered:

Risks & Rollout

Potential impact, migrations, or config/secrets required.

Checklist

• Linked an issue and added a clear description
• Added/updated tests for changed code (where applicable)
• Updated docs (README/AGENTS) when behavior or commands changed
• Ran detektAll, runTest, and :app:lint locally (or via CI)
• No secrets or local.properties committed

[WRRicht3r]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 718e6e7fe0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[WRRicht3r]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".