Open
Conversation
|
👋 Thanks for contributing to Viper! You are awesome! 🎉 A maintainer will take a look at your pull request shortly. 👀 In the meantime: We are working on Viper v2 and we would love to hear your thoughts about what you like or don't like about Viper, so we can improve or fix those issues. ⏰ If you have a couple minutes, please take some time and share your thoughts: https://forms.gle/R6faU74qPRPAzchZ9 📣 If you've already given us your feedback, you can still help by spreading the news, https://twitter.com/sagikazarmark/status/1306904078967074816 Thank you! ❤️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes a new function
viper.Originthat allows finding the origin of a configuration value.It might be used for following use cases:
viper.Origin(key) < viper.ValueOriginDefault)The implementation is largely based on
(*Viper).find, but instead of returning the option values, it returns aviper.ValueOriginbased on the current code path.Alternatively, you could also return a
ValueOriginfrom(*Viper).findand then expose that throughviper.Origin. This way there would be less code duplication. Let me know if you prefer this approach.What still needs to be done/discussed:
ValueOrigintypeviper.ValueOriginOverrideare quite long.intorstringas underlying type?stringallows for easy human-readable output,intallows for comparisons inside of the hierarchy (see above). Maybe add(ValueOrigin).String()?intis used, the order of the values