chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #10693)

[parthodas23]

Resolves #10693 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• RangeError Fix: Added a safety check in @stdlib/_tools/github/create-issue to prevent a RangeError: Invalid time value when parsing rate limit reset timestamps.
• Refactor Nested Functions: Moved get and set methods in @stdlib/nlp/lda to the module scope to comply with stdlib/no-unnecessary-nested-functions and improve memory efficiency.
• Lint Cleanup: Removed unused eslint-disable directives in @stdlib/boolean/ctor tests that were triggering errors due to strict reporting.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• Fix JavaScript lint errors #10693

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
boolean/ctor	$\color{green}103/103$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}0/0$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}103/103$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
nlp/lda	$\color{red}461/855$ $\color{green}+53.92%$	$\color{green}18/18$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{red}1/11$ $\color{green}+9.09%$	$\color{red}461/855$ $\color{green}+53.92%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.