Skip to content

Conversation

@manideeppmdmd
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:

    • The student has provided two different approaches to solve the problem, showing a good understanding of the problem.
    • The comments are helpful in understanding the thought process.
    • The code is well-structured and readable.
  • Areas for Improvement:

    • The comment about removing duplicates in the first method is incorrect since the problem allows duplicates. This should be clarified or removed.
    • The second method's base case (i == candidates.length && target == 0) is unnecessary and could lead to missing valid combinations. The reference solution handles this more elegantly.
    • Method names could be more descriptive to reflect their purpose.
    • The while loop in the second method to skip duplicates is not needed for this problem since duplicates are allowed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants