Done Design-1

[tembhreashli]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

1. Both solutions are correct and efficient, matching the expected time and space complexities.
2. The code is well-commented, making it easy to understand the approach.
3. Good use of helper methods (hash1 and hash2) to encapsulate the hashing logic.
4. Proper handling of edge cases, such as the special case for bucket 0 in the HashSet implementation.

Areas for Improvement:

1. In the HashSet implementation, the variable names could be more descriptive. For example, buckets and bucketItems could be renamed to primaryBuckets and secondaryBuckets to match the reference solution and improve clarity.
2. The MinStack implementation could benefit from a brief comment explaining why two stacks are used and how they work together to maintain the minimum element.
3. Consider adding a brief explanation of the double hashing technique in the comments for the HashSet implementation to help readers understand the collision resolution strategy.