Skip to content

Conversation

@dummdidumm
Copy link
Member

We have to use an effect - not a render effect - for updating the title, and always. That way we change the title only after any pending work has completed.

Fixes #17060

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • If this PR changes code within packages/svelte/src, add a changeset (npx changeset).

Tests and linting

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

We have to use an effect - not a render effect - for updating the title, and always. That way we change the title only after any pending work has completed.

Fixes #17060
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: b90232d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@17061

export function template_effect(fn, sync = [], async = [], blockers = [], defer = false) {
flatten(blockers, sync, async, (values) => {
create_effect(RENDER_EFFECT, () => fn(...values.map(get)), true);
create_effect(defer ? EFFECT : RENDER_EFFECT, () => fn(...values.map(get)), true);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't love this, but it felt even weirder to have a entirely different method that is 90% the same, and I couldn't come up with a good name for that method

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

experimental fork API loads <title> prematurely

2 participants