- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 138
 
chore: update core #1807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: update core #1807
Conversation
ab40243    to
    cb60d7c      
    Compare
  
    a8da37f    to
    a720a26      
    Compare
  
    | nativeConnection: NativeConnection, | ||
| namespace: string | undefined | ||
| namespace: string | undefined, | ||
| public readonly address: string | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you confirm this addition resolves #1787?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, added a test to verify that when used with .createLocal the field contains the correct address.
I initially missed that this was the public facing test environment class and not the wrapper we use for our own tests. I needed some way to create an additional connection and making this public seemed sensible, but open to other options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM from a worker heartbeating POV, deferring to James for overall approval
| 
           My mistake, i messed up my git while trying to work on my new branch after branching off of your branch 😅  | 
    
This reverts commit e09a2dc.
d1dee88    to
    9d197d7      
    Compare
  
    
What was changed
TSIA
Why?
With the code moving, updating core is more involved than usual. Doing this in a separate PR to make it easier to review.
Checklist
Closes N/A
How was this tested:
Existing tests
Any docs updates needed?
I do not believe so