Open
Conversation
Author
|
I've updated the PR to make it more flexible. It now takes a generic filter function that takes in a number of variables. This solution is more imperative, but it allows greater latitude for potential use cases. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
This PR adds support for an optional
--leafsPathcommand line argument. If provided, theleafsfile should contain a JSON object with GraphQL types (including unions, if desired) as keys and "leaf" fields to include as as array values. For example:When
gql-generatorencounters the listed types anywhere other than at the top-level, it will exclude any fields not included in the associated array.We implemented this because we use a lot of nested revolvers, and the queries, while useful, were also large and unwieldy. This feature allows us to still generate comprehensive queries, without the redundant overkill of traversing Types that have their own stand-alone queries.
I implemented this feature for my team's internal use. If this doesn't seem generally useful to others, feel free to close this PR.