A landmark study redefining democracy through fiduciary-epistemic theory. This paper argues that AI firms function as knowledge fiduciaries and that democracy’s survival depends on embedding fiduciary duties—candour, care, impartiality, and accessibility—into the architecture of AI governance. It proposes new legal forms such as Epistemic Fiduciary

RAIL — Record & Archive Index Ledger documents the public structure, continuity, and governance of the Debbaut.Solutions Execution Ecosystem. It provides a transparent, auditable trail of updates and canonical assets under a unified Execution Framework.

A unified theoretical framework integrating political theory, political epistemology, and Epistemic Clientelism Theory to analyse and reform the structures of epistemic power in governance, institutions, and social systems.

A groundbreaking study in fiduciary-epistemic theory that reimagines the modern university as a constitutional guardian of knowledge. It exposes how marketisation and managerialism erode truth, compares universities to hybrid AI firms, and proposes legal reform to restore candour, accountability, and public trust in knowledge.

Canonical repository for “The Cohesive Tetrad: Jalan Menuju Kebenaran”, an epistemic and ethical framework for truth governance integrating Sabda, Logic, Qualia, and Mystica with Akhlak as the surface of verification (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/D5S7V).

This essay critiques how university marketing, rankings, and promotional narratives may perpetuate epistemic violence by silencing plural knowledges, urging institutions to recognise their fiduciary epistemic duties and adopt inclusive practices.

🧠 Reconceptualize cognitive dissonance as an epistemic event, exploring its impact on freedom, anxiety, and conformity through a philosophical lens.

This paper reinterprets cognitive dissonance as structural to epistemic life. Drawing on philosophy, psychology, and fiduciary law, it shows how collapse yields illusory freedom, while fiduciary scaffolds enable bounded freedom, epistemic resilience, and institutional pluralism.