Skip to content

Conversation

@IonicaBizau
Copy link
Contributor

Like #23, but using https instead of http. I have three reasons to do this:

  • https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.1.min.js works fine with https
  • //example.com/script.js is a little bit slower than https://example.com/script.js (I did read a blog post about that, but cannot find it right now.) But it's obvious, the browser should resolve them using the current protocol.
  • //example.com/script.js will give a nasty error when $.visiting local HTML files.

@travist I found this nice library after watching your talk about it. Niiiice stuff! 👏 🎉

@IonicaBizau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@travist Do you still maintain this repo?

@travist
Copy link
Owner

travist commented Jan 8, 2016

Yes I do... this looks fine to me. Thanks.

travist added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2016
@travist travist merged commit dde31d6 into travist:master Jan 8, 2016
@IonicaBizau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@travist 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants