-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
feat: add type safety for builder configurations with discriminated unions #80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pranaygp
wants to merge
1
commit into
pranaygp/standardize-method-naming
Choose a base branch
from
pranaygp/add-builder-type-safety
base: pranaygp/standardize-method-naming
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+55
−6
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "@workflow/builders": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Add type safety for builder configurations with discriminated unions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
isValidBuildTargettype guard function doesn't include the'next'build target in its validation logic, but the new discriminated unionWorkflowConfignow includesNextConfigwithbuildTarget: 'next'. This will cause type mismatches and incorrect validation.View Details
📝 Patch Details
Analysis
isValidBuildTarget() type guard doesn't validate 'next' build target
What fails: The
isValidBuildTarget()type guard function inpackages/builders/src/types.tsonly validates'standalone'and'vercel-build-output-api'targets, but theBuildTargettype andvalidBuildTargetsconstant include'next'. This causes the type guard to returnfalsefor a valid discriminant value that is part of theWorkflowConfigunion type.How to reproduce:
Result:
isValidBuildTarget('next')returnsfalse, even though'next'is:validBuildTargetsconstantBuildTargettypeWorkflowConfigdiscriminated union viaNextConfigThis causes type safety violations - code constructing a
NextConfigwithbuildTarget: 'next'would fail validation with the type guard.Expected: The type guard should return
truefor all three valid build targets, matching theBuildTargettype definition derived fromvalidBuildTargets.Fix: Changed the implementation to use the
validBuildTargetsconstant for validation rather than hardcoded literals. This ensures any new build targets added tovalidBuildTargetsare automatically validated, preventing future regressions.