backport: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27608,28583#6
Draft
Shailendra53 wants to merge 7 commits intovijaydasmp:developfrom
Draft
backport: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27608,28583#6Shailendra53 wants to merge 7 commits intovijaydasmp:developfrom
Shailendra53 wants to merge 7 commits intovijaydasmp:developfrom
Conversation
✅ No Merge Conflicts DetectedThis PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs. |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
Shailendra53
changed the title
Shailendra53
force-pushed
the
backport-btc-skg
branch
from
a1b2f98 to
f7f20f8
Compare
Shailendra53
changed the title
Shailendra53
force-pushed
the
backport-btc-skg
branch
from
f7f20f8 to
bac30a4
Compare
…or other peers 52e5207 p2p: Avoid prematurely clearing download state for other peers (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: Avoid letting one peer send us data that clears out the download request (and related timers etc) from another peer. The exception is if a block is definitely stored to disk, in which case we'll clear the download state (just as we do for compact blocks). ACKs for top commit: jamesob: ACK 52e5207 ([`jamesob/ackr/27608.1.sdaftuar.p2p_avoid_prematurely_cl`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/27608.1.sdaftuar.p2p_avoid_prematurely_cl)) instagibbs: ACK 52e5207 fjahr: Code review ACK 52e5207 mzumsande: Code Review ACK 52e5207 Tree-SHA512: 3ee92507edc3303c16c70ca44ba6c28c104afe95196e4b9167032590ed23d4f569f654f8eb8758940bd6536bc9ca810d2a77d2739db386b927e8b3f3cf55cb16
fa05a72 tidy: modernize-use-emplace (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Constructing a temporary unnamed object only to copy or move it into a container seems both verbose in code and a strict performance penalty. Fix both issues via the `modernize-use-emplace` tidy check. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK fa05a72 hebasto: ACK fa05a72. TheCharlatan: ACK fa05a72 Tree-SHA512: 4408a094f406e7bf6c1468c2b0798f68f4d952a1253cf5b20bdc648ad7eea4a2c070051fed46d66fd37bce2ce6f85962484a1d32826b7ab8c9baba431eaa2765 Merge bitcoin#28583: refactor: [tidy] modernize-use-emplace fa05a72 tidy: modernize-use-emplace (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Constructing a temporary unnamed object only to copy or move it into a container seems both verbose in code and a strict performance penalty. Fix both issues via the `modernize-use-emplace` tidy check. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK fa05a72 hebasto: ACK fa05a72. TheCharlatan: ACK fa05a72 Tree-SHA512: 4408a094f406e7bf6c1468c2b0798f68f4d952a1253cf5b20bdc648ad7eea4a2c070051fed46d66fd37bce2ce6f85962484a1d32826b7ab8c9baba431eaa2765 Merge bitcoin#28583: refactor: [tidy] modernize-use-emplace fa05a72 tidy: modernize-use-emplace (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Constructing a temporary unnamed object only to copy or move it into a container seems both verbose in code and a strict performance penalty. Fix both issues via the `modernize-use-emplace` tidy check. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK fa05a72 hebasto: ACK fa05a72. TheCharlatan: ACK fa05a72 Tree-SHA512: 4408a094f406e7bf6c1468c2b0798f68f4d952a1253cf5b20bdc648ad7eea4a2c070051fed46d66fd37bce2ce6f85962484a1d32826b7ab8c9baba431eaa2765 Merge bitcoin#28583: refactor: [tidy] modernize-use-emplace fa05a72 tidy: modernize-use-emplace (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Constructing a temporary unnamed object only to copy or move it into a container seems both verbose in code and a strict performance penalty. Fix both issues via the `modernize-use-emplace` tidy check. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK fa05a72 hebasto: ACK fa05a72. TheCharlatan: ACK fa05a72 Tree-SHA512: 4408a094f406e7bf6c1468c2b0798f68f4d952a1253cf5b20bdc648ad7eea4a2c070051fed46d66fd37bce2ce6f85962484a1d32826b7ab8c9baba431eaa2765
Shailendra53
force-pushed
the
backport-btc-skg
branch
from
bac30a4 to
118d43f
Compare
004903e test: Add Wallet Unlock Context Manager (Brandon Odiwuor) Pull request description: Fixes bitcoin#28601, see bitcoin#28403 (comment) Add Context Manager to manage the locking and unlocking of locked wallets with a passphrase during testing. ACKs for top commit: kevkevinpal: lgtm ACK [004903e](bitcoin@004903e) maflcko: lgtm ACK 004903e Tree-SHA512: ab234c167e71531df0d974ff9a31d444f7ce2a1d05aba5ea868cc9452f139845eeb24ca058d88f058bc02482b762adf2d99e63a6640b872cc71a57a0068abfe8
vijaydasmp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2026
…BlockTx suppression fa9dc92 test: Add missing CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlockTx suppression (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Fixes bitcoin#28865 (comment) ``` # FUZZ=policy_estimator UBSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1" ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz /tmp/crash-154b42214e70781a9c1ad72d3f2693913dcf8c06 ... policy/fees.cpp:632:27: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'unsigned int' of value 4294574080 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int' changed the value to -393216 (32-bit, signed) #0 0x55cbbe10daee in CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlockTx(unsigned int, CTxMemPoolEntry const*) src/policy/fees.cpp:632:27 #1 0x55cbbe10e361 in CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlock(unsigned int, std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry const*, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry const*>>&) src/policy/fees.cpp:680:13 #2 0x55cbbd84af48 in policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1::operator()() const src/test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:69:40 #3 0x55cbbd84af48 in unsigned long CallOneOf<policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_2, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_3>(FuzzedDataProvider&, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_2, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_3) src/./test/fuzz/util.h:43:27 #4 0x55cbbd84af48 in policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>) src/test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:38:9 #5 0x55cbbda1cc18 in std::function<void (Span<unsigned char const>)>::operator()(Span<unsigned char const>) const /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/std_function.h:591:9 #6 0x55cbbda1cc18 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp:178:5 dashpay#7 0x55cbbd26a944 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x190e944) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) dashpay#8 0x55cbbd253916 in fuzzer::RunOneTest(fuzzer::Fuzzer*, char const*, unsigned long) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18f7916) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) dashpay#9 0x55cbbd25945a in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18fd45a) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) dashpay#10 0x55cbbd284026 in main (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x1928026) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) dashpay#11 0x7fe4aa8280cf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x280cf) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) dashpay#12 0x7fe4aa828188 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x28188) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) dashpay#13 0x55cbbd24e494 in _start (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18f2494) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: implicit-integer-sign-change policy/fees.cpp:632:27 in ``` ``` # base64 /tmp/crash-154b42214e70781a9c1ad72d3f2693913dcf8c06 AQEAAAAAADkFlVwAAQEAAAAAADkFlZVcACTDSSsP3746IAZrH48khwMAAQEB/QEALQAACwAAAAAA FgAAAAAAAQAABgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACcQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD6AAAAOQWVXAABAQAA AAAAOQWVlVwAIMNJKw/fvjogBmsfjySHAwABAQH9AQAtAAALAAAAAAAAAAABAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAJxAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPr/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAA AAEBAeAIAVwBXAAA/jbSBvwBKABSKBwBYgEB2wAEkvXInHYAAAAAAAAAvgAAAAAA/9//6v8e/xIk MgAlAiUAOw== ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fa9dc92 dergoegge: utACK fa9dc92 Tree-SHA512: 3898c17c928ecc2bcc8c7086359e9ae00da2197b4d8e10c7bf6d12415326c9bca3ef6e1d8d3b83172ccfa604ce7e7371415262ba705225f9ea4da8b1a7eb0306
fa4c683 test: Fix failing time check in rpc_net.py (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This check fails on slow runners, such as s390x qemu. Fix it by using mocktime. See bitcoin#28523 (comment) ACKs for top commit: 0xB10C: ACK fa4c683 pinheadmz: ACK fa4c683 brunoerg: crACK fa4c683 Tree-SHA512: 83fb534682e11e97537dc89de8c16f206f38af1a892a2d5970c02684c05eaea8fc9adba3159f16b2440ca0b3871d513a0562a6f3a38f19a5574a47be0919e42f
fa4c683 test: Fix failing time check in rpc_net.py (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This check fails on slow runners, such as s390x qemu. Fix it by using mocktime. See bitcoin#28523 (comment) ACKs for top commit: 0xB10C: ACK fa4c683 pinheadmz: ACK fa4c683 brunoerg: crACK fa4c683 Tree-SHA512: 83fb534682e11e97537dc89de8c16f206f38af1a892a2d5970c02684c05eaea8fc9adba3159f16b2440ca0b3871d513a0562a6f3a38f19a5574a47be0919e42f
…case. Removing that code to avoid its usage.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bitcoin backport changes