Skip to content

Conversation

@Cristib05
Copy link
Contributor

This commit makes use of #98464 and deletes a multicast route by specified interface.

Copy link
Contributor

@rlubos rlubos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix the line length

@Cristib05 Cristib05 force-pushed the border_router_del_mcast_by_iface branch from ad1e187 to c6b1575 Compare November 4, 2025 15:17
@Cristib05
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please fix the line length

did it, completely forgot about this :(

jukkar
jukkar previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2025
pdgendt
pdgendt previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2025
rlubos
rlubos previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2025
This commit makes use of zephyrproject-rtos#98464 and deletes a multicast route by
specified interface.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Bulacu <cristian.bulacu@nxp.com>
@Cristib05 Cristib05 dismissed stale reviews from rlubos, pdgendt, and jukkar via 8c74e35 November 4, 2025 15:56
@Cristib05 Cristib05 force-pushed the border_router_del_mcast_by_iface branch from c6b1575 to 8c74e35 Compare November 4, 2025 15:56
@Cristib05
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added net_if_ipv6_maddr_rm, after multicast group was left and route was deleted

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@cfriedt cfriedt added this to the v4.4.0 milestone Nov 6, 2025
@cfriedt
Copy link
Member

cfriedt commented Nov 6, 2025

Just assuming this is a feature addition, so I added the 4.4.0 milestone. If that was not the right assumption, please ping.

@Cristib05
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cristib05 commented Nov 6, 2025

Just assuming this is a feature addition, so I added the 4.4.0 milestone. If that was not the right assumption, please ping.

It is a continuation of #98464 which has been merged last week, it would be nice to have this in the current release, to avoid some issues

@jhedberg jhedberg merged commit 4520215 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Nov 13, 2025
29 checks passed
@Cristib05
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rlubos, do you think it would be possible to add the content of this PR as backport? And for this #98972 as well?

@rlubos
Copy link
Contributor

rlubos commented Nov 19, 2025

@Cristib05 It'd require a bug report, but it shouldn't be a problem if you just create an issue for those.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: Networking area: OpenThread backport v4.3-branch Request backport to the v4.3-branch size: XS A PR changing only a single line of code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants