Fix 5GeVx100GeV hgas config: add SYNRAD component and correct filename #6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Renamed egasbrems_egascoulomb_egastouschek_hgas_5GeVx100GeV_vacuum_10000Ahr_machineruntime_50s.json to synrad_egasbrems_egascoulomb_egastouschek_hgas_5GeVx100GeV_vacuum_10000Ahr_machineruntime_50s.json - Added missing SYNRAD component (status 2000, freq 36608000) at the beginning - File now follows consistent naming pattern with all other beam energy configurations - Maintains all existing components: electron beamgas, coulomb, touschek, and 100 proton beamgas files 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
Does this PR change default behavior?