Skip to content

Conversation

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of what I changed

Addresses pending comments of PR #1494

E2E test

TESTED:

Please replace this with a description of how you tested your PR beyond the
automated e2e/unit tests.

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • I have read and will follow the
    review process.

  • I am familiar with Google Style Guides for the language I have coded in.

    No? Please take some time and review
    Java and
    Python style guides.

  • My IDE is configured to follow the Google
    code styles.

    No? Unsure? ->
    configure your IDE.

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored existing
    code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

  • If I made any Python code changes, I ran black . and pylint . right
    before creating this pull request and added all formatting changes to my
    commit.

  • All new and existing tests passed.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 46.68%. Comparing base (cd5f908) to head (2e63c6a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1529      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     46.72%   46.68%   -0.04%     
  Complexity      677      677              
============================================
  Files            90       90              
  Lines          5875     5875              
  Branches        824      824              
============================================
- Hits           2745     2743       -2     
- Misses         2822     2824       +2     
  Partials        308      308              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bashir2 bashir2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes @ndegwamartin but the main goal is to remove the two extra @Nullable annotation added in the production code (see this comment); I don't think those two files are changed in this PR, are they?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants