Skip to content

DNM: CORENET-6864: allow for CNI version 1.1.0#278

Closed
jluhrsen wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jluhrsen:CORENET-6864
Closed

DNM: CORENET-6864: allow for CNI version 1.1.0#278
jluhrsen wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jluhrsen:CORENET-6864

Conversation

@jluhrsen
Copy link

ovnk has updated to use v1.1.0 [0] and was getting rejected by multus as invalid. I noticed semver being used in pkg/server/config/generator.go so refactored to use that removing the hardcoded version checks and using v0.3.0 as the threshold

[0] ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes@845456d

ovnk has updated to use v1.1.0 [0] and was getting rejected by multus
as invalid. I noticed semver being used in pkg/server/config/generator.go
so refactored to use that removing the hardcoded version checks
and using v0.3.0 as the threshold

[0] ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes@845456d

Signed-off-by: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 27, 2026

@jluhrsen: This pull request references CORENET-6864 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

ovnk has updated to use v1.1.0 [0] and was getting rejected by multus as invalid. I noticed semver being used in pkg/server/config/generator.go so refactored to use that removing the hardcoded version checks and using v0.3.0 as the threshold

[0] ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes@845456d

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 27, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dougbtv and s1061123 February 27, 2026 21:16
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 27, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jluhrsen
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign s1061123 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

jluhrsen added a commit to jluhrsen/origin that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2026
the following test cases are duplicated with test that will
run with the ovnk OTE work which will be enabled with this
PR [0]. they are failing because upstream OVNK has bumped
it's CNI version to 1.1.0 and these tests are hardcoded
here (or in multus [1]) and don't accept 1.1.0 yet. The
upstream change in ovnk also updated it's tests so when they
run via OTE, they will pass.

[0] openshift#30560
[1] openshift/multus-cni#278

Signed-off-by: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@gmail.com>
@jluhrsen
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-aws

@jluhrsen
Copy link
Author

jluhrsen commented Mar 2, 2026

/close
@bpickard22 will be opening a d/s merge since upstream has this handled already

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Mar 2, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 2, 2026

@jluhrsen: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
@bpickard22 will be opening a d/s merge since upstream has this handled already

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jluhrsen
Copy link
Author

jluhrsen commented Mar 3, 2026

/reopen
just want to test this with other PRs. will close later. marking as DNM and draft as well.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Mar 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 3, 2026

@jluhrsen: Reopened this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/reopen
just want to test this with other PRs. will close later. marking as DNM and draft as well.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 3, 2026

@jluhrsen: This pull request references CORENET-6864 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

ovnk has updated to use v1.1.0 [0] and was getting rejected by multus as invalid. I noticed semver being used in pkg/server/config/generator.go so refactored to use that removing the hardcoded version checks and using v0.3.0 as the threshold

[0] ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes@845456d

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jluhrsen jluhrsen marked this pull request as draft March 3, 2026 04:57
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 3, 2026
@jluhrsen jluhrsen changed the title CORENET-6864: allow for CNI version 1.1.0 DNM: CORENET-6864: allow for CNI version 1.1.0 Mar 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 3, 2026

@jluhrsen: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/origin#30560
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/957eef30-16bd-11f1-8ef6-8f3a336991c0-0

@jluhrsen
Copy link
Author

jluhrsen commented Mar 3, 2026

/close
#280 should do the trick

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Mar 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 3, 2026

@jluhrsen: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
#280 should do the trick

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

sgoveas pushed a commit to sgoveas/origin that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2026
the following test cases are duplicated with test that will
run with the ovnk OTE work which will be enabled with this
PR [0]. they are failing because upstream OVNK has bumped
it's CNI version to 1.1.0 and these tests are hardcoded
here (or in multus [1]) and don't accept 1.1.0 yet. The
upstream change in ovnk also updated it's tests so when they
run via OTE, they will pass.

[0] openshift#30560
[1] openshift/multus-cni#278

Signed-off-by: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhrsen@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants