Conversation
bca4299 to
13e7164
Compare
|
| Status | Total | Passed | Failed | Skipped | Flaky | Pass Rate | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 tests failed | 58 | 46 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 79% | 1m 3s |
AI Analysis
Summary
- What failed: 10 tests across 4 files, all related to API and visual testing, with 100% assertion failures.
- Root cause: The assertion failures stem from unexpected responses from the API, including incorrect status codes (400, 404, 201) and missing properties in the response body (e.g.,
undefinedvalues fortokenandusername). Additionally, a visual test failed due to a missing screenshot snapshot. - Code changes related: Recent changes in the workflow configuration added the
@apitag to the test run, which may have affected the execution context or the API endpoints being tested. The package updates could also introduce breaking changes or incompatibilities.
Fix
- Specific fix needed:
- Verify the API endpoints and ensure they are returning the expected responses, especially for valid credentials and existing users.
- Update the tests to handle cases where the API might return unexpected results (e.g., check for
undefinedbefore asserting). - Ensure that the visual test has the correct snapshot available or adjust the test to create a new snapshot if it does not exist.
|
| Status | Total | Passed | Failed | Skipped | Flaky | Pass Rate | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 tests failed | 58 | 45 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 78% | 1m 2s |
AI Analysis
Summary
- Failures: 10 total failures across 4 files, all categorized as Assertion failures.
- Root Cause: The primary issue stems from incorrect expectations in assertions, including checking for undefined values, incorrect status codes, and missing snapshots. Specifically, the API tests expect certain responses (like status codes and token values) that are not being met, indicating potential issues with the API or test setup. Additionally, the visual test fails due to a missing snapshot file.
Code Changes Related:
- A minor change was made in
cart_checkout.spec.js, which does not appear to directly relate to the current failures. This change may not have impacted the failing tests.
Fix
- API Tests: Review and update the API endpoints and payloads to ensure they return the expected responses. Verify that the user exists before attempting to update or delete, and ensure that the correct status codes are being asserted.
- Visual Test: Create the missing screenshot snapshot for
github-login.pngor adjust the test to handle the absence of a snapshot appropriately.
|
| Status | Total | Passed | Failed | Skipped | Flaky | Pass Rate | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 tests failed | 58 | 46 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 79% | 1m 1s |
AI Analysis
Summary
- Failures: 10 total failures across 2 files, all categorized as Assertion failures.
- Root Cause: The primary issue is that the expected responses (status codes, token values, and user data) do not match the actual responses from the API. This indicates potential issues with the API endpoints being tested, such as incorrect request handling, missing data, or unexpected status codes. Additionally, a visual test failed due to a missing screenshot snapshot, indicating a lack of prior baseline for comparison.
Code Changes Related:
- A single file (
cart_checkout.spec.js) was modified with an additional login function. This change does not appear to directly relate to the failing tests, suggesting that the failures stem from the API behavior rather than recent code modifications.
Fix
- Investigate the API endpoints being tested to ensure they are functioning as expected. Verify that the correct data is being sent in requests and that the API is returning the anticipated responses. For the visual test, ensure that the required screenshot snapshot is created and available for comparison.
30142a4 to
4595422
Compare
Updated Playwright test workflow to use Node.js 20.x and adjusted shard settings. Added merging of reports and improved environment variable handling.
Updated configuration settings for Playwright tests, including retries, workers, timeout, and reporter options.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.